LABOUR, SOCIAL REPRODUCTION AND THE TIME OF LAW

  • Henrique Weil Afonso Damas Catholic College

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a historical scrutiny of the interplay between legal regulation and social reproduction. The question of marketization of the social sphere has been gaining significant attention over the past decades. While social theorists update Polanyian analysis of the status of embedded and disembedded markets to understand present-day crisis of social reproduction, it is relevant to situate these in light of historical lenses. By focusing on the idea of uberization of labour and care work, it considers, in the first case, how contemporary forms of labour are detrimental to the maintenance of the social fabric and, in the second one, how long-standing forms of violence are reproduced. It develops an argument according to which the disruption of work-related regulation has a direct connection to the inability of legal systems to institutionalize proper social times that are not reducible to market time.

References

AFONSO, Henrique Weil, MAGALHÃES, José Luiz Quadros, “The Third World, History and International Law”, Brazilian Yearbook of International Law, 2013, 107-126.
ALMEIDA, Silvio, Racismo Estrutural, São Paulo, 2019.
ANGHIE, Antony, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge, 2004.
ANTUNES, Ricardo, “The New Service Proletariat”, Monthly Review, 2018, 23-29.
BAXI, Upendra, “Postcolonial Legality”, in SCHWARZ, Henry, RAY, Sangeeta (eds.), A Companion to Postcolonial Studies, Oxford, 2005, 540-555.
BRANDÃO, Claudio, “The roots of human rights: the epistemological turn provoked by Francisco de Vitória”, Humanities and Rights Global Network Journal, 2019, 7-20.
BRAZIL, Lei no. 13.467, de 13 de julho de 2017, http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/lei/l13467.htm, accessed 15 February 2020.
DAVIS, Mike, Planet of Slums, London, 2006.
DUSSEL, Enrique, The Invention of the Americas – Eclipse of “the Other” and the Myth of Modernity, New York, 1995.
EBNER, Alexander, “Marketization: Theoretical Reflections Building on the Perspectives of Polanyi and Habermas, Review of Political Economy, 2015, 369-389.
FLEMING, Peter, “The Human Capital Hoax: Work, Debt and Insecurity in the Era of Uberization”, Organization Studies, 2017, 1-19.
FRASER, Nancy, “A Triple Movement? Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi”, in: BURCHARDt, Marian; KIRN, Baj (eds), Social Analysis after 1989, London, 2017, 29-42.
FRASER, Nancy, “Contradictions of Capital and Care”, New Left Review, 2016, 99-117.
FRASER, Nancy, “Marketization, Social Protection, Emancipation: Toward a Neo-Polanyian Conception of Capitalist Crisis”, in: Calhoun, Craig; Derluguian, Georgi (orgs), Business as usual: the roots of global financial meltdown, New York, 2011, 137-158.
FRASER, Nancy, Scales of Justice – Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, New York, 2010.
HARTOG, François, Regimes de Historicidade: presentismo e experiências do tempo, Belo Horizonte, 2015.
HIRATA, Helena, “Care Work: a comparison of Brazil, France and Japan”, SUR, 2016, 53-63.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA, Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua (PNAD Contínua), September 2019, https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/25534-desemprego-cai-para-11-8-com-informalidade-atingindo-maior-nivel-da-serie-historica accessed 20 February 2020.
JODHKA, Surinder; REHBEIN, Boike; SOUZA, Jessé, Inequality in Capitalist Societies, New York, 2018.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart, Futures Past: on the semantics of historical time, New York, 2004.
KREIN, José, ABÍLIO, Ludmila, FREITAS, Paula, BORSARI, Pietro, CRUZ, Reginaldo, “Flexibilização das relações de trabalho: insegurança para os trabalhadores”, Revista do Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 15ª Região, 2018, 41-66.
MANGIAMELI, Stelio, “State, European Integration, and Globalization. New challenges for Constitutionalism”, Humanities and Rights Global Network Journal, 2019, 161-206.
MOORE, Jason W., “The Capitalocene Part II: accumulation by appropriation and the centrality of unpaid work/energy”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2017, 1-43.
MUNCK, Ronaldo, “The Precariat: a view from the South”, Third World Quarterly, 2013, 747-762.
OST, François, Le Temps du Droit, Paris, 1999.
PATEL, Raj, MOORE, Jason, A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things, Oakland, 2017.
POLANYI, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston, 2001.
READ, Jason, “Primitive Accumulation: The Aleatory Foundation of Capitalism”, Rethinking Marxism, 2002, 24-48.
SANDEL, Michael, What money cannot buy – the moral limits of markets, New York, 2012.
SANTOS, Boaventura Sousa, Toward a new common sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition, New York, 1995.
SENNETT, Richard, The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, New York, 1998.
THE GUARDIAN, The ‘gig economy’ is coming. What will it mean for work?, 25 July 2015, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/26/will-we-get-by-gig-economy accessed 6 February 2020.
TULLY, James, “The Imperialism of Modern Constitutional Democracy”, in LOUGHLIN, Martin; WALKER, Neil, The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford, 2007, 315-338.
TULLY, James, Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity, Cambridge, 1995.
UNITED NATIONS, World Social Report 2020 – Inequality in a rapidly changing world, https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/02/World-Social-Report2020-ExecutiveSummary.pdf accessed 10 February 2020.
UNITED NATIONS, World Inequality Report 2018, https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/sites/default/files/publication/document/2018/7/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf accessed 10 February 2020.
Published
2020-06-24
How to Cite
Afonso, H. (2020). LABOUR, SOCIAL REPRODUCTION AND THE TIME OF LAW. HUMANITIES AND RIGHTS GLOBAL NETWORK JOURNAL, 2(1), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.24861/2675-1038.v2i1.29